@CommonHealth: Wikipedia and “energy” therapist clash over definition of “respectable scientific journals”

ss We link to a CommonHealth guest post by a Spaulding Rehab doc Eric Leskowitz. He promotes new age approach to pain known as “energy medicine “ and says he’s  been dismissed by Wikipedia as a “quack” despite his peer-reviewed work and Harvard cred

Hard to disagree with the first part of Wikipedia’s response to a petition supporting Leskowitz…

 If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals – that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Wikipedia will cover it appropriately..

.…except to say: What’s defines a “respectable”  journal.  True, not all peer review is equal, but who makes that call?

Wikipedia errs on the safe side and sets a high evidence bar. Still, Wikipedia’s ‘s citation of  Quackwatch — a virulently  anti-alt medicine web site — seems shaky. That site casts its net widely, ragging on everything from faith healers to acupuncture and massage therapy.

And the rest of Wikipedia’s response seemed kind of harsh…

What we won’t do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of “true scientific discourse”. It isn’t.

At the same time, Leskowitz doesn’t do himself any favors by citing Dr. Mehmet Oz’s endorsement.  Dr. Oz has been known to promote less than substantiated therapies.

Energy Psychology has even gotten some fairly mainstream attention, from television’s Dr. Oz to The Huffington Post.

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: