Many Boston docs help red flag overhyped, innaccurate health reporting

Reporting on health can be difficult. Copy editors plop “breathrough” into headlines. Green reporters don’t know the difference between a randomized clinical trial and an epi study.  And, editors wants something sexy to take to the morning meeting.

So, we should have little mercy on gutted newsrooms of the nation. Then, we should call them out. Despite the above, it is not that hard to get it right. And, bad reporting is dangerous and helps perpetuate everything that is wrong with the health care system.

So, we note that an old favorite website has a new look. Bookmark it.  We also note a lot of Boston and Cambridge folks among the docs and journalist contributing to Health News Review. Check it out:

What is is a website dedicated to:

  • Improving the accuracy of news stories about medical treatments, tests, products and procedures.
  • Helping consumers evaluate the evidence for and against new ideas in health care.

We support and encourage the ABCs of health journalism.

  • Accuracy
  • Balance
  • Completeness

One Response to “Many Boston docs help red flag overhyped, innaccurate health reporting”

  1. Hakeem Says:

    Hi! Can you please advice me on how to create an accurate and trustworthy health report.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: